Politics, they say, is the art of the possible. But the possible is not fixed. What we believe is possible depends on our knowledge and beliefs about the world. Ideas can change the world, and Green House is about challenging the ideas that have created the world we live in now, and offering positive alternatives.
The problems we face are systemic, and so the changes we need to make are complex and interconnected. Many of the critical analyses and policy prescriptions that will be part of the new paradigm are already out there. Our aim is to communicate them more clearly, and more widely.
In this, we will remain independent of political parties, campaigns or commercial vested interests, but will be happy to cooperate with anybody – individuals or organisations – who shares our beliefs and our sense of urgency.
THE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE - REVISITED
The idea of a Progressive Alliance - with 'progressive' candidates standing down in elections to help 'progressives' from other parties to get elected - was influential in the general election but controversial, perhaps especially so in the Green Party. At times it seemed as though Greens were the only party in the alliance! Greens stood down in many constituencies and may have played a crucial role in preventing the Conservatives from winning an overall majority. But the Green Party arguably gained very little for itself, making sacrifices which Labour candidates benefited from. This pamphlet explores the issues from a range of perspectives, looking at the arguments for and against a Progressive Alliance and the questions it raises for the Green Party. It includes contributions from Rupert Read, Victor Anderson, Neal Lawson, Jonathan Essex, and Sara Parkin.
It can be downloaded here.
TOWARDS DEEP HOPE – JOHN FOSTER
Green House is pleased to announce the recruitment of a new member to its core group - John Foster, the writer and philosopher based in Lancaster. John is perhaps best-known as the author of ‘After Sustainability’ (Earthscan/Routledge, 2015), and he has been collaborating with Green House since that publication, with a particular focus on developing our approach to climate change.
The first major outcome of this collaboration is an essay entitled ‘Towards Deep Hope’, which forms a report for the new Green House project ‘Facing Up to Climate Reality’ (see below). This is an important contribution to the climate change debate, at perhaps the most fundamental level: an essay on what climate change tells us about the place of human beings in the world and what being realistic about our climate future entails.
Facing up to climate reality, John Foster writes, clearly demands that we confront the future realistically. This essay is a conceptual exploration, conducted through reference to relevant policy issues, of what realism here could mean.
On one interpretation, it could mean recognising the compelling evidence that we have left it too late to save ourselves from climate disaster. But on another interpretation, it might be realistic to insist that we can never, even in extremis, rule out the transformative possibilities of human action. We could call hope inspired by such possibilities counter-empirical, since it refuses to be daunted by likelihoods, albeit dismaying, derived from past experience.
Counter-empirical hope, however, is protected by definition against merely contingent failure – if what is thus hoped for just happens not yet to have happened, we can always go on hoping. (Hence the constant tendency of such hope to slide into utopianism.) But – again, by definition – we can’t be hoping for anything unless we recognise some risk that it won’t happen. So what is risked in counter-empirical hope must be that we find ourselves up against necessary rather than contingent failure: and the domain of significant necessary failure in human affairs is that of tragedy, where destructive weaknesses are the inescapable concomitants of key life-strengths.
Active recognition that our climate plight is already tragic is the only way to keep honest the kind of hope on which we must now rely. That means not only escaping from the recently-popular and still solutions-oriented ‘wicked-problem’ framing of the issues, but also building tragic awareness into all practical policy thinking henceforth. If we can manage this, hope can still reach out for transformative possibility while remaining deeply and realistically grounded.
You can download the essay here, or order it in printed form from our Publications pages.
FACING UP TO CLIMATE REALITY
Green House has launched a new major project. This project addresses the widening chasm between climate science and climate policy, the reasons for it, and how to bridge it. Its starting point is that the time for false hope is past, and only courageous realism will enable us to respond adequately to now inevitable and impending serious climate damage. This message – as we have found already when expressing it in public – can be cathartic, leading to a realistic assessment of future needs and prospects and avoiding the despair and paralysis that result from the collapse of a fragile or shallow optimism. The premise and shape of the project are set out in an introductory essay available here.
As the second publication under the umbrella of this project, we are very pleased to publish an essay by Robert Hutchison entitled ‘This Moment: the emergency, the opportunity’. Hutchison argues powerfully that the climate situation must be declared and treated as a global emergency if we are to have any chance of responding appropriately. Unlike Brian Heatley and Rupert Read in their Introduction to the project (link above), he still sees the very urgency of the situation as primarily an opportunity, in that the recognition of the emergency may be precisely what is required to trigger action to avert it, whereas Heatley and Read believe that the time for averting the worst of the catastrophe has almost certainly passed, and that ‘appropriate action’ now means mitigation not so much of human-caused climate change itself, but of the worst impacts that now unavoidable change will visit on global human civilization. The debate between these two slightly different perspectives on the climate reality that now faces us is a vital one: it might even be termed the vital debate of our time.
We were very sad indeed to hear the news of Robert's sudden death at the end of September. Robert Hutchison was a distinguished campaigner, author and activist for the arts and the environment, and this essay is a testament to and legacy of his commitment, courage and clear thinking.
SINISTER INTEREST - REFORMING THE MEDIA
The political turmoil in the UK over the last two years has drawn attention once more to
the questionable role of the media in our democracy. In our latest pamphlet, three Green House authors - John Blewitt, Molly Scott Cato and Rupert Read - argue that Britain’s mainstream media is no longer fit for purpose. Its coverage of the EU and Scottish referendums, the General Election, and the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, as well as the unethical practices revealed by the Leveson Inquiry and its woefully inadequate coverage of climate change and other escalating ecological threats, have made the need for fundamental reform both more obvious and more urgent. The structure and concentration of media ownership, and the interference of shady anti-democratic organisations in the public sphere, are endangering one of the essential institutions that a liberal democracy requires to function effectively.
This polemical pamphlet is a significant contribution to the current debate about what needs to be done if democracy is to flourish in a world of ‘fake news’ and ‘post-truth’. Only the enemies of democracy and of open public debate and discussion benefit from an unreformed media and the widespread assumption it engenders - that everybody lies.
Read 'Sinister Interest - Reforming the Media' here.
PLEASE NOTE: The related public discussion event planned for Aston University in Birmingham on 27 November has had to be cancelled. Our apologies to all those who wanted to take part.
DEALING WITH EXTREME WEATHER
This event took place in Lancaster on Saturday 28 October, with about 70 people taking part. A report, videos and photos can be viewed here.
This event was organised by the Green European Foundation with the support of Green House Think Tank and with the financial support of the European Parliament to the Green European Foundation.
Green House has coordinated a transnational project for the Green European Foundation entitled ‘The potential impact of Brexit on the prospects for a Green transition in Europe’. Six countries took part – France, Germany, Ireland, Poland, Sweden and the UK. In each country, a public discussion event was held with a particular focus on the implications of Brexit for that country; the events were linked by a common framework of questions and by the participation of some expert contributors at more than one event. The concluding conference was held in London on 11 November, and brought together representatives from the all the participating countries and organisations in the search for a better understanding of the challenges posed both to the UK and to Europe.
Speakers at the concluding conference included Norman Baker, Molly Scott Cato, Terry Reintke, Jean Lambert, and Caroline Lucas, as well as politicians and experts from all the other countries involved. A report, videos and photographs can be viewed here.
Green House is funded mainly by donations. If you wish to donate to help our work, you can use the button below. If you are considering making a very large donation, or one with conditions attached, please send an email via our contact form.